Friday, April 07, 2006

Just Hiding in the Grass....



TO ALL OF MY NO ON "C" FRIENDS:

I HAVE WALKED THROUGHOUT SONOMA VALLEY AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE YEAR AND NOTICED THAT RATTLESNAKES CHANGE COLORS RELATIVE TO THEIR ENVIORNMENT--MUCH LIKE CHAMELEONS. GREENER IN THE SPRING AND AS THE GRASS TURNS DRY THEY TAKE ON A MUCH LIGHTER COLOR--I THINK WE COULD REFER TO THIS AS COMOUFLAGE.

WITH THIS IN MIND, DO NOT BE LULLED INTO A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY BECAUSE THE RATTLESNAKES ARE STILL WAITING FOR YOU TO BE OFF GUARD! THEY JUST WAIT TO DEVOUR YOU WHEN YOU LEAST EXPECT IT.

IF YOU ARE FOLLOWING MY THOUGHT PATTERN YOU'LL REALIZE THAT THESE "SNAKES" ARE ONLY CALLING OFF THEIR CAMPAIGN BECAUSE THEY MAY HAVE IDENTIFIED A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT HAS A WILLING SELLER.
WHAT THEY HAVE NOT CALLED OFF IS THE ELECTION!

BE SURE TO TELL EVERYONE THAT WAS VASCILLATING ABOUT EMINENT DOMAIN THAT THEY ARE STILL VOTING ABOUT AN ENORMOUS TAX ISSUE--$148,000,000!

I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS ONE MORE SLIMEY MOVE ON THEIR PART TO LIE TO THOSE THAT HAVE NOT MADE UP THEIR MINDS. VERY DEVIOUS!

There is another old Spanish saying: They don't even know how to season the lie well enough to have me swallow it!


AGAIN, REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE DEALING WITH AND TELL ALL TO VOTE NO ON "C"!!


RICH CASELLI, D.D.S.

SEND THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!

2 Comments:

At 4:12 PM, Blogger Tom said...

Rich:

You have no evidence that the YES on C folk are donig anything underhanded. It seems somewhat inapproprate to suggest they do.

The fact is, this news on the new site and the shut down of the YES campaign pretty much guarantees a victory for NO on C.

I'm not sure why the NO on C committee would endorse that kind of Official communication. It's inflamatory and muddies the waters when you could just as easily run the campaign from the high road and have the same outcome.

 
At 12:02 AM, Blogger Athena said...

Maybe not underhanded exactly, but the timing did seem awfully odd. I kept hearing that there was no alternative site possible. It was stated that alternatives had been investigated before choosing the Leveroni property. That was used as the reasoning for the our way or the highway campaign and the threats that the hospital would close if they didn't get their way.

According to this PD article it says a couple of guys had a glass of wine and hatched this plan and pulled it off overnight. Why couldn't any of the very competent hospital district folks have pulled this out of their hat on their own then? I thought all alternatives had been investigated and ruled out?

Something doesn't pass the smell test. It may be that there is nothing underhanded, and if that is the case, the public deserves an answer for why the people paid to do this didn't come up with this solution themselves over a glass of wine?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home